Friday, September 28, 2007

John, Mary topped Social Security Administration list of boy, girl names in 1907

Ya gotta love the Social Security Administration. If you want to know the most popular girl's name for 2006, (It was Emily. Jacob was number one for boys) all you have to do is look on their Web site: www.ssa.gov/OACT/babynames/

In fact, you can access a list of the 1,000 most popular first names for each year starting in 1880 up through 2006. In 1891, the year my grandfather, Frank Hoy, was born, his first name ranked sixth. When my grandmother, Anna Schrader was born in 1911, her first name also sat in spot number six. 

Social Security has created the ranked lists based on card applications for each year. One hundred years ago, in 1907, the following were the top 10 names for boys:

1. John 
2. William 
3. James
4. George
5. Robert 
6. Charles 
7. Joseph 
8. Frank 
9. Edward 
10. Henry

The top 10 names for girls in 1907 were the following: 
1. Mary 
2. Helen 
3. Margaret 
4. Anna 
5. Ruth
6. Dorothy 
7. Elizabeth
8. Mildred 
9. Alice 
10. Marie 

My first name (which is Teresa and not Terry) was ranked 42nd in popularity the year I was born. In 2006, my name's popularity was down to 535th. C'est la vie! 

Until next time — Happy Ancestral Digging. Note this post first published online, September 28, 2007, at Desktop Genealogist Blog at The News-Messenger Online http://www.thenews-messenger.com/apps/pbcs.dll/section?Category=BLOGS02
©28 Sept 2007, Desktop Genealogist Unplugged, Teresa Snyder 

Thursday, September 27, 2007

Linkpendium — For The Easily Distracted

I am an information junkie. I collect useless information like some people collect coins. As someone recently reminded me, time is a very precious commodity and when you get those rare moments when you can actually work on your genealogy, you want to make that time pay off. All of which, is my way of telling you that my clicking onto Cyndi's list (http://www.cyndislist.com/) is like a 3-year-old finding momma's secret chocolate stash — You dive in gobbling up as much as you can as fast as you can until you pass out in an orgy of information (or chocolate as the case may be). 

All those categories, how can I ignore them? I may start with the intention of looking up marriage records in Jasper County, Missouri, but oooh, let me just take a peek at that “Lost and Found” category. And wait, I've always wanted to know who has the copyright to e-mail — the sender or the receiver? And what's this category, “Hit A Brick Wall?” — Cyndi must have added that one just for me. And so it goes. I keep clicking on link after link, until, and I'm not really sure how, I've ended up on a page about West Indian Manatees with all my "free" time consumed. That is why I've resorted to using another list when time is short and I need to focus on the task at hand. 

Linkpendium (http://www.linkpendium.com/) is actually a complementary rather then a competitive list to Cyndi's Web site. When Rootsweb was gobbled up by Ancestry.com, the founders, Karen Isaacson and Brian Leverich began putting together a directory of Web sites related to genealogy. The number of links is now well over 6 million. It's divided into two categories, surnames and localities. Right now, the localities category only encompasses locations in the U.S. It is broken down by state, then by county. Jasper County, Missouri, where I was hypothetically looking for marriage records has 231 links, with 24 categories — two of the links relate to marriage records. Sandusky County has 421 links, spread over 26 categories, with our own Rutherford B. Hayes Presidential Center being mentioned as one of the links. 

Linkpendium comes in handy for two reasons. First, I store my census records by census year, state and county, so when I am focusing on an individual I just look to see where he or she was living at a particular time and then I start my search in the appropriate county. 

Second, because all the links on the page relate to one county, even if I do start clicking like crazy, I usually can find the information I seek, or at the very least, find other interesting genealogical information related to the individual I am working on.

So, if like me, you need to make the most of your “genealogy time,” you might consider giving Linkpendium a try. As for me, I have to go back to Cyndi's List and check out that “Hit a Brick Wall” category.

Until Next Time — Happy Ancestral Digging Note this post first published online, September 27, 2007, at Desktop Genealogist Blog at The News-Messenger Online http://www.thenews-messenger.com/apps/pbcs.dll/section?Category=BLOGS02
©27 Sept 2007, Desktop Genealogist Unplugged, Teresa L. Snyder 

Wednesday, September 26, 2007

Civil War Pensions and More at NARA

If you want to order a federal Civil War pension packet (confederate civil war pensions are not held by NARA), you will need to know the following information:

1. Soldier’s Name 

2. The Union state from which he served 

3. His unit and company Where can you find his unit and company?

1. Sometimes the veteran's obituary will have the information.
2. Sometimes the veteran's tombstone will have the information. 
3. Ancestry's Pension Index (subscription required) 
4. Footnote's Civil War Pension Index (currently only 60% complete) See my Blog “New Website for Genealogy and History Buffs” for information on their 7-day free access proposition. 
5. County history books will sometimes mention this information. The Rutherford B. Hayes Presidential Library contains many county histories as well as Civil War information. To search the library's catalog go to this link: http://www.rbhayes.org/hayes/catalog/. (This will explain where the online catalog is housed.) 
6. Civil War Soldiers and Sailors System http://www.itd.nps.gov/cwss/index.html The site contains a searchable database for both union and confederate soldiers and gives regimental histories. The best part? Access is free! 

There is a comment section on the order form to give more information. For example, in the military records of my great-great-grandfather Edward Jacobus, he is sometimes known as Edward Jacobs thanks to transcription errors. Adding pertinent information like this can save you from paying $37 ($75 plus after Oct. 1) for the wrong man's file.

If you are interested in finding where Confederate Pensions are kept, go to this link on NARA: http://www.archives.gov/genealogy/military/civil-war/confederate/pension.html 

To find more information about compiled military service records available at NARA, go to this link: http://www.archives.gov/research/order/vets-records.html

For a general discussion on all military records and resources at NARA, go to this link: http://www.archives.gov/genealogy/military/ See yesterday's blog for more specific information on how to order. 

Until Next Time — Happy Ancestral Digging! Note this post first published online, September 26, 2007, at Desktop Genealogist Blog at The News-Messenger Online http://www.thenews-messenger.com/apps/pbcs.dll/section?Category=BLOGS02
©26 Sept 2007, Desktop Genealogist Unplugged, Teresa L. Snyder 

Tuesday, September 25, 2007

Placing an Order with NARA

It's taken a little bit of time to figure out what the limitations are for the Web design on our blogging format. In the body of the blog I can't: 

1. Italicize the print 
2. Underline the print 
3. Apply bold formatting to the print 
4. Add hyperlinks (unless the Web address is spelled out and then only if you have clicked into the actual full entry of the blog — seriously, that's really a pain.) 

Because of this, I am a little worried that the news of NARA's rate increase effective this coming MONDAY, OCTOBER 1, might have been missed. So, on the off chance, that someone might be interested in placing an order before the big rate hike, I'm going to give you some steps for accomplishing this. Now maybe all of you are a lot smarter than I am, and you can go to NARA's Web site and figure it out in a snap, but I have ordered several times since they first allowed online ordering last year, and every time I have to start from scratch figuring out what in the heck they want me to do.

First, go to this Web address: https://eservices.archives.gov/orderonline/start.swe?SWECmd=Start. (If you have clicked on the full entry button, you will see this as a blue hyperlink that you can just click on to go to the correct page.) 

1. You will need to log in, or if you haven't already registered you will need to do this first. (If you are only “looking” you can skip this part.) 
2. Then you will need to click on the “made to order reproductions” tab. This will take you to a second screen.
3. There are seven choices on the menu: a. Census b. Court Records c. Immigration and Naturalization Records d. Land Files e. WW I Draft Registration Cards f. Military Service and Pension Records g. Native American Records
4. Clicking on any of these menu choices will take you to a page that will give you a description of the record choice, the current cost of the item and frequently asked questions.
5. Once you decide what you are ordering, it is very similar to ordering from Amazon or JC Penney. There is one exception. Each item must be placed on a separate order. However, you can have multiple orders placed at the same time. 
6. An order confirmation page will appear with the following items on it: a. Order Number b. Order Date c. Product d. Total Charge 
7. Print this confirmation page. That way if there is any question on whether or not you will be paying the pre October 1 rate, you have all the proof you need. Believe me, depending on the order; we are talking a significant difference. 

Should you order great-great-grandpa's land entry record or his Civil War pension record? I don't know. The problem with the system is that you don't know exactly what you are getting until the package arrives. Paying $17.75 to get four ambiguous pieces of paper that constitute Joseph's land entry package is probably not a good bargain, unless you need to prove some disputed dates. 

A distant cousin and I ordered the same ancestor's pension package at different times. There were 27 pages in the packet. (NARA says the average is 105, but you can't prove it by me. The most I have received was 92.) The cousin was disappointed. I, on the other hand, was thrilled. But then again, I tend to be sentimental and sappy. Information to me is pure gold. 

Tomorrow, I will have a short blog about ideas on how to find the information needed to order a Civil War veterans federal pension packet. Until then — Happy Ancestral Digging! Note this post first published online, September 25, 2007, at Desktop Genealogist Blog at The News-Messenger Online http://www.thenews-messenger.com/apps/pbcs.dll/section?Category=BLOGS02
©25 Sept 2007, Desktop Genealogist Unplugged, Teresa L. Snyder 

Ain't Nobody Listenin'

My feelings were bruised the other day when I read an entry in one of the News-Mess forums. The poster said, “Not to mention I am really disappointed with the blogs so far. Not that many people have an interest in genealogy …” In a later post, the individual went on to say, “… I simply stated that not very many people are interested in those topics. I think we need a wider selection of topics that 'more people' would find interesting. And it isn't just me, I have talked to a lot of people who feel the same way.” Talk about being dissed! So I did what I normally do in these situations, I sulked. Then I stewed, and if my left upper molar hadn't been bothering me, I would have eaten half a bag of Ballreich's Potato Chips and Toft's French Onion dip with a Pepsi chaser. 

Lord, do I know how to sulk! And stew. After a day of ruminating, I told my husband “I think I'm going to blog about this.” 

And my omniscient husband said, “I know.” 

“How do you know? I just decided to blog about it right this second.” 

“Because, any time you stew on something this long, I know you well enough to know that you won't let it go.” 

Lord, what a smart man I married. So here's what I have to say to you, gentle poster — you're right. You had an opinion and you have every right to express it. (Although I must confess Larry Flynt's quote about opinions did flicker across my temporal lobe. Hey, I said it just flickered.) I say to you, and your “lot of people,” I'm sorry that you don't find my topic of choice interesting. It makes me sad and I'm sure if enough people share your opinion, I'll be disappearing from the blogging scene pretty darn soon. I will say in defense of my subject that several articles have said that genealogy is the fastest growing hobby second to gardening. Having said that, I haven't found any hard statistic that backs that statement up.

It could have been a case of somebody spit-balling the idea, and hey, you know the Internet, once it's out there it keeps being quoted as if it's the gospel truth. Personally, the things that attract me to genealogy are (in no particular order):

1. I suffer from RCS (Rampant Curiosity Syndrome) and genealogy makes good use of this particular character flaw. 
2. My brain, unlike my personality, is organized and logical. It likes all those wonderful statistics — dates, names, places. 
3. I'm a sucker for a good mystery — and mysteries abound when you start mucking around your family history. I love all that sleuthing. 
4. I meet the most fascinating people from all over the world. I communicated with one very nice German gentleman who didn't speak much English. I only know one German phrase — Das ist gut, ja? We used a Google translator. Now that was fun. Somehow, we managed. It was darn satisfying and entertaining.
5. Finally, it's all about me — well at least in a limited sort of way.

So for all of you who don't find my subject interesting, I say that's cool. Write about what interests you. Do it as a blog, an opinion, or however you want to express yourself. Life is way too short to worry about whether other people are interested or not. William Zinsser says, “You are writing primarily to please yourself, and if you go about it with enjoyment you will also entertain the readers who are worth writing for.” 

If my writing doesn't interest enough people, the plug will be pulled. If I still feel the need to blog (after I am done stewing and eating Ballreich's), I will create my own blog. Maybe I won't restrict myself to just genealogy in a new blog. Maybe I'll call it, “Over the Hill — Ain't Nobody Listenin'” Blog. But that's just me spitballin'.

Until Next Time … Note this post first published online, September 25, 2007, at Desktop Genealogist Blog at The News-Messenger Online http://www.thenews-messenger.com/apps/pbcs.dll/section?Category=BLOGS02
©25 Sept 2007, Desktop Genealogist Unplugged, Teresa L. Snyder 

Friday, September 21, 2007

It's All in the Details















Sooner or later, when people find out that I “do” genealogy they will ask the inevitable question, “How far back have you gone?” Invariably they will know someone who has taken their family history back to William the Conqueror, the Mayflower or some other very old, very proper family line. The question always makes me squirm, though it's a perfectly logical and valid question.

Early on, my goal was to take each family line back to when they had “crossed the pond”, but something funny happened along the way. I started getting absorbed into the daily minutia that was each ancestor's life. With each newly found ancestor, I was unable to move on until I had devoured every stray detail. As a child, I used to imagine that if I colored the picture of Sleeping Beauty perfectly, with the right colors, staying in the lines, the picture would come to life. Apparently, I operate under that same principle when it comes to genealogy. If I can just fill in enough details, add the color of their daily lives, then maybe my ancestors will “come to life” for me. The approach didn't work at four, but ever the optimist, a half-century later my heart still believes it can happen.

Above is the only picture that I have of either my great-grandfather, John Perry Lynch or my great-grandmother Laura Jane Feasel Lynch. It was taken in either 1923 or 1924, a few short years before Laura Jane's death. In the picture, JP and Laura Jane are surrounded by their four living children, a daughter-in-law, and some of their grandchildren. John Perry is the grumpy-looking man on the left and Laura Jane is seated directly in front of him. John Perry was a creative man — he was an amateur artist and a musician. As a creative fellow, JP found it difficult to make a living. He was, at various times, a farmer, a laborer, a merchant and a telegrapher. I don't think he found joy in any of those professions. He was always restless, ready to move on to something else. 

He lived in Seneca County, Ohio; Crawford County, Illinois; Greer County Oklahoma; Washington County, Arkansas; before finally moving back to Fremont, Ohio where he died in 1930. His obituary appeared in The Fremont Messenger, May 20, 1930 with a caption that read, “Poison Fatal to John Lynch”. (A typed account of the obituary appears at this link — http://familytreemaker.genealogy.com/users/s/n/y/Teresa-Snyder/FILE/0019page.html.)

Somehow, JP always came back to Northwest Ohio. I think that it was Laura Jane, who acted as the rubber band that pulled the family back each time. I know from postcards and letters that even when the family was living in other places, Laura Jane would make extended visits back to Seneca County where her mother and siblings lived. The visits would be so long that young Katie, my grandmother, would be enrolled in school for the duration of the visit

Laura Jane died before my mother was born so mother has no first hand memories of either JP or Laura. My Aunt Florence, the little blondie in the back row of the picture, has filled in some of the blanks. Florence tells stories of Laura letting the children play and run around on the front porch. There apparently was a music room in the house where JP had his musical instruments including a piano. The grandchildren were not allowed in this room. However, when JP was out in the fields working, Laura would open up the door to the room and let little Florence go in and bang on the piano to her hearts content, all the while Laura was watching out the door for any signs of JP. When she would see him coming she would tell Florence to close up the keys, and they would close the door. Florence was wise enough to know this was a secret shared only with Grandma.

In this picture, I can almost feel the sun caressing Laura's face, the casual swinging of a foot back and forth, and the contented smile of a woman surrounded by the family she loves. For me, this is where the research leads. For a moment, I feel connected to this woman, my great-grandmother. Just a moment, but for me that is enough.

Until Next time — Happy Ancestral Digging Note this post first published online, September 21, 2007, at Desktop Genealogist Blog at The News-Messenger Online http://www.thenews-messenger.com/apps/pbcs.dll/section?Category=BLOGS02
©21 Sept 2007, Desktop Genealogist Unplugged, Teresa L. Snyder 

Thursday, September 20, 2007

A Blog Version of ‘A Dog Ate My Homework’

As I was starting to type this blog today, my keyboard started confusing Z's for Y's. Just like that — out of the blue — the first sentence now read: “As I was starting to tzpe this blog todaz, mz kezboard started confusing Y's for Z's.”

Panicked, I started searching for clues in Google. I typed in the phrase “swapping z for y.” (Except, of course, I had tapped the letter y first then z, well, you get the idea.) A few hits told me that people sometimes wanted to do this on purpose because European keyboards, especially those made for German speakers, did this very thing. So great, I had somehow managed to succeed in doing what others had labored diligently to do, ON PURPOSE. Except of course, hello, that wasn't my goal.

Because I had an extended warranty on my Hell Computer, I could always call customer service and see if this type of issue was covered. Early on, I had purchased a special 30-day, “you can call us anytime” package when I had first received my Laptop in November. An issue of it not being able to read scripts when I was on AOL had prompted me to call them. Since that call had gone so “swell” (i.e., not only the problem wasn't fixed but also my AOL software had developed even larger problems than the original one.), I was loath to try that route. 

Of course, some of that may have been my fault. Now, I am all for a global economy — I believe large middle class citizens in any given country spells stability, so I try to be patient when I get “Hank” on the line with a strong Indian accent. Maybe it's just me but when someone starts off lying to me and telling me their name is Hank or Bert or whatever when their name is really Rashid, etc, then I have trust issues popping up all over the place. Additionally, I find when you have to explain the meaning of S-O-L, as in my response to him — “So Hank, then I'm just S-O-L?” well, you've already lost the battle. 

Being cranky from a variety of other sources already (a really crummy work project and my head pounding from a high pollen count) I was clearly not up for one of these extended encounters. So I went into my Control Panel, opened the keyboard icon and pressed buttons. I don't know if the pressing of buttons helped, but just as suddenly as the problem appeared, it disappeared.

See, zzzzzzz and yyyyyy — they work. I'm sure there is a moral to this story, but all that worrying about how I was going to retrain my fingers to reach for z when I really meant y, has knocked any objectivity I may have had, right out of my head. 

So, anyway, that's why you're not getting a Genealogy/Internet Blog today. I know, it sounds a lot like “my dog ate my homework,” but that's how my day is going. 

Until Next Time — Happy Ancestral Digging
Note this post first published online, September 20, 2007, at Desktop Genealogist Blog at The News-Messenger Online http://www.thenews-messenger.com/apps/pbcs.dll/section?Category=BLOGS02
©20 Sept 2007, Desktop Genealogist Unplugged, Teresa L. Snyder 

Terry

Terry

Labels